Florida law on matching ballot signatures being applied unconstitutionally: Judge

“The precise issue in this case is whether Florida’s law that allows county election officials to reject vote-by-mail and provisional ballots for mismatched signatures — with no standards, an illusory process to cure, and no process to challenge the rejection — passes constitutional muster. The answer is simple. It does not,” Walker wrote in the order.

The court ruling is not an order for county canvassing boards to “count every mismatched vote, sight unseen,” Walker wrote, but instead is an order to “allow those voters who should have had an opportunity to cure their ballots in the first place to cure their vote-by-mail and provisional ballots now, before the second official results are fully counted.”

Vote-by-mail and provisional ballots have become increasingly popular, Walker said, but the county canvassing boards, which determine whether a voter’s signature on vote-by-mail and provisional ballots match state records, are “staffed by laypersons that are not required to undergo formal handwriting-analysis education or training.”

Nevertheless, ballots considered to have “mismatched signatures” are rejected as invalid votes. Voters who are notified before Election Day of this discrepancy on their ballot can attempt to “cure,” or address the problem, but the judge ruled that under previous law, the window to do so was too narrow, and in some cases, nonexistent.

If this “last chance” to cure is denied, “Florida law provides no opportunity for voters to challenge the determination of the canvassing board that their signatures do not match, and their votes do not count,” Walker ruled.

For provisional ballots, the other type of ballot under inspection by the lawsuit, there was neither a cure period or a mechanism for a voter to challenge the decision that the voter wasn’t eligible to vote.

“Consider the game of football,” Walker wrote. Rules are made and rules are followed, he said, but sometimes calls deserve reviews.

“Indeed, not every call is going to be clear — the ultimate decision may hinge on highly subjective factors. Hence, a call will be overturned only when there is ‘clear and obvious visual evidence available that warrants the change’,” Walker wrote, citing 2018 NFL rules.

“In this case, the Plaintiffs have thrown a red flag. But this is not football. Rather, this is a case about the precious and fundamental right to vote — the right preservative of all other rights,” Walker wrote.

Like the game of football, elections are governed by their own set of laws that allow for an “efficient and transparent” process.

And, as in football, Walker wrote, “There is no doubt that election officials must make certain calls, under the rules, that deserve review. And there is no doubt some of those calls may hinge on highly subjective factors.”

Republican Gov. Rick Scott, running against Nelson in the tight race for Florida’s Senate seat, filed an immediate appeal of the ruling, which his campaign’s press secretary called “baseless.”

There are at least 3,688 vote-by-mail ballots and 93 provisional ballots, from 45 of 67 counties reporting, that were rejected by counties for a signature mismatch. That number that does not include questioned ballots from bigger counties, including Duval and Miami-Dade. How much of an impact the questioned ballots would have depends, on how many voters correct signature issues by Saturday. Scott currently leads Nelson by 12,562 votes.

The deadline for Florida counties to finish their machine recounts in Nelson’s Senate race against Scott, as well as in the governor’s race pitting former Republican Rep. Ron DeSantis against Tallahassee Mayor Andrew Gillum, a Democrat, is 3 p.m. Thursday.

Before that deadline, however, court action is expected on Nelson’s lawsuit in federal court seeking to nullify all deadlines and give counties as much time to count votes as is needed, which, if ruled in Nelson’s favor, would erase the need for counties to hit the 3 p.m. deadline.

Sourse: abcnews.go.com

Florida law on matching ballot signatures being applied unconstitutionally: Judge

0.00 (0%) 0 votes